This bibliography attempts to accommodate all accordant items through 1974 (together with some items from 1975). It is allotment of a assignment in progress, a analysis adviser to SF beneath the accepted editorship of D. Suvin, to be appear by G.K. Hall and Co. We accede acquiescently the banking abutment of a Québec FCAC grant, and the advice of the McGill University Inter-Library Loans Office.
S1-S6. Bibliographies
S1. [B.M. Parchevskaia]. Dzhek London: Biobibliograficheskii ukazatel’. 1969 (Moskva: Kniga-Vsesoiuznaia gos. biblioteka inostrannoi literatur; 149p). Introductory commodity on London by N.M. Èishiskina, with basal chronology. In four parts: London’s publications in English (books by him, periodicals and anthologies, Soviet editions in English); non-Russian accessory abstract on London (English and a few German titles); translations of London into Russian (almost 700 items); accessory abstract in Russian (526 titles). Good indexes but not wholly satisfactory proofreading of English items. Indispensable to acceptance of Russian items.
S2. James E. Sisson. “Jack London’s Plays: A Chronological Bibliography.” 1971 (pp. 17-20 of Jack London, Daughters of the Rich, Oakland: Holmes). Lists 17 London plays, with some assembly and advertisement data.
S3. Date L. Walker with James E. Sisson III. The Fiction of Jack London: A Chronological Bibliography (El Paso: Texas Western Press; xvi 40). Chronological and partly annotated advertisement of London’s fiction appear in English. Includes agenda of London’s books and life, and index. The asperous annotations accommodate accessible advice on sources, reprintings, and analytical comment.
S4. Hensley C. Woodbridge, John London, and George H. Tweney. Jack London: A Bibliography. 1972 (Millwood NY: Krauss Reprint; continued copy of assignment aboriginal appear 1966; 554p). Allotment one (writings by London) includes Books, Collections in English, Anthologies in English, Foreign Language Collections and Anthologies, Abbreviate Stories, Contributions to Periodicals, Introductions and Prefaces, Separately Appear Ephemera, Spurious Works, Motion Pictures Based on London’s Works. Allotment two (writings about London) includes Books and Pamphlets in English, Genitalia of Books about London in English, Accessories About London in English, Foreign Writings about London, Theses and Dissertations, Reviews of Books in English, Reviews of Books in Foreign Languages. The 1973 amplification is a 118-page supplement by Woodbridge to best of the divisions. With appellation and personal-name index. Best complete bibliography to date.
S5. Hensley C. Woodbridge. Supplements to S4 in Jack London Newsletter. 1973 (6: 31-54, 123-30), 1974 (7: 48-54, 85-89, 127-31), 1975 (8: 28-31, 80-82, 133-37).
S6. The bibliographies of Gaer 1934 rpt 1970, Chomet 1949, Haydock 1960, Schubert 1964, Woodbridge 1966, Walker 1967, in the Jack London Newsletter 1967-69, of Labor 1968, Libman 1969, Sisson 1970, Pownall 1974, and Woodress 1974 are abolished by S1-S5. But see additionally S16 Foner, S23 Brown, S25 Bykov, S28 Weiderman, S30 Walker, and S31 Labor.
C1-C2. SF Collections
C1. The Science Fiction of Jack London: An Anthology. Ed. Richard Gid Powers. 1975 (Boston: Gregg). See S33. Contains ##3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18.
C2. Analytical Fragments: Jack London’s Tales of Fantasy Fiction. Ed. Dale L. Walker. 1975 (Port Washington NY and London: Kennikat). See S34. Contains ## 1,2,3,5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,18, additional three fantasy or bordering fantasy tales.
##1-18. SF Acceptance and Novels. Bordering cases are consistently difficult to categorize. We acquire absitively to accommodate the “pre-historic” but not the fantasy or semi-fantasy fiction. Best of these acceptance acquire been reprinted abounding times; for capacity see S1-S5.
#1. “A Thousand Deaths.” 1899 (Black Cat [Boston], May). Drowned man undergoes a alternation of acknowledged downtime experiments, and revenges himself through atomic abrasion by agency of “apergy” (a chat adopted from J.J. Astor’s A Journey In Added Worlds, 1894).
#2. “The Awakening of Above Rathbone.” 1899 (Conkey’s Home Journal, Nov). Lymph admixture is acclimated for rejuvenation.
#3. “A Relic of the Pliocene.” 1901 (Collier’s, Jan 12). 1904 (in London’s The Faith of Men and Added Stories, NY&L: Macmillan). Arctic alpine annual about the killing of the aftermost mammoth.
#4. “The Minions of Midas.” 1901 (Pearson’s, May). 1906 (in London’s Moon-Face and Added Stories, NY&L: Macmillan). Terrorist accumulation attempts to blackmail millions from capitalists through assassination.
#5. “The Shadow and the Flash.” 1903 (Bookman [NY], June). 1906 (in Moon-Face; see #4). Two battling “mad scientists” devise altered agency of authoritative themselves invisible.
#6. Before Adam. 1906-07 (Everybody’s, Oct-Feb). 1907 (NY&L: Macmillan). Young man relates dreams of his actuality in the mid-Pleistocene as a affiliate of a simple amiable bodies abashed by a added technically avant-garde tribe.
#7. The Iron Heel. 1908 (NY&L: Macmillan). Journal purportedly accounting in 1932 anecdotic the advancing of a 20th-century absolutist absolutism and the accessory advocate attrition movement, with Foreword and addendum by a analyst active in a left-wing so-
ciety 700 years later. N.B. To our knowledge, of the contempo US reprints of this novel, alone the Hill and Wang copy of ca. 1974 is a abounding text; the others (e.g. Hill and Wang 1967 and Bantam 1971) misadvisedly omit London’s “Foreword,” which is evidently by the abstract commentator, “Anthony Meredith”; see Darko Suvin, “Is the Administrator Consistently Right?,” SFWA Buletin No. 51/52 (Summer 1974), and his letter in No. 53A (Fall 1974).
#8. “The Enemy of All the World.” 1908 (Red Book, Oct). 1914 (in London’s The Strength of the Strong, NY: Macmillan). Report on the case of a bent scientist of the 1930s who explodes armament from a distance.
#9. “A Analytical Fragment.” 1908 (Town Topics [NY], Dec 10). 1911 (in London’s Back God Laughs and Added Stories, NY: Macmillan, 1911). Underground story-teller in the 26th-century absolutism of The Iron Heel (#7) describes a abominable chance in the advocate attempt of the worker-slaves. The chance is presented by an historian of the abstract 43rd century.
#10. “Goliah.” 1908 (Red Magazine, Dec). 1910 (in London’s Anarchy and Added Essays, NY: Macmillan). Chance purportedly accounting in the abstract 23rd century, adulatory a benevolent science astrologer who, by agency of a able explosive, brought accord and socialism to the apple in 1924.
#11. “The Dream of Debs.” 1909 (International Left-wing Review, Jan-Feb). 1914 (in Strength; see #8). A absolute accepted bang in the 1940s is described.
#12. “The Unparalleled Invasion.” 1910 (McClure’s, July). 1914 (in Strength; see #8). Bacteriological air warfare is auspiciously acclimated by the White admiral in 1976 to stop the amplification of China.
#13. “When the Apple Was Young.” 1910 (Saturday Evening Post, Sept 10). 1913 (in London’s The Night-Born, NY: Century). A admirable agent eventually overcomes his atavistic antique to savagery.
#14. “The Strength of the Strong.” 1911 (Hampton’s, March). 1914 (in Strength; see #8). Prehistoric apologue of amusing development: a association moves from archaic communism through chic ascendancy to the “strength” of aggregate action.
#15. The Scarlet Plague. 1912 (London Magazine, June). 1915 (NY: Macmillan). A aged survivor of the all-embracing affliction of 2013 recalls 60 years afterwards the acknowledgment to atrocity which ensued.
#16. The Star Rover [also pbd as The Jacket]. 1914 (the American Sunday Monthly Magazine area of the Los Angeles Examiner, Feb 14 to Oct 10). 1915 (NY: Macmillan). An bedfellow of San Quentin prison, bedfast in a straight-jacket, relives his accomplished incarnations in altered times and places.
#17. The Acorn Planter. 1916 (NY: Macmillan). Play about the battle amid the aesthetic “Acorn Planter” and the Warrior, reenacted in three actual epochs and catastrophe with the advance of the acorn-planters.
#18. “The Red One.” 1918 (Cosmopolitan, Oct). 1918 (in London’s The Red One, NY: Macmillan). Dying on a South Pacific island inhabited by savages, a white man discovers an astronomic apple of interstellar origin, the acceptation of which charcoal a mystery.
S7-S35. Accessory Works.
S7. Charmian London. The Book of Jack London. 1921 (NY: Century; 2 vols., 422p and 414p). Sentimental and hero-worshiping biography, admired as a almanac of London’s conversations and letters.
S8. Fred Lewis Pattee. “The Prophet of the Aftermost Frontier.” 1922 (pp. 98-160 of his Side-Lights on American Literature, NY: Century). 1930 (rev. as “Jack London,” pp. 121-43 of his The New American Literature: 1890-1930, NY&L: Century). Within a bound aesthetic range, London, like Kipling, was a adept of agnostic extremes and “startling pictures,” a “prophet of claret and vulgarity” in the turn-of-the-century acknowledgment adjoin aestheticism. His “fierce individualism” and “supermen” are appropriate dreams from the active American west. An ancient approach, affliction his materialism and award redeeming qualities in his bounded Americanism.
S9. Granville Hicks. The Great Tradition: An Estimation of American Abstract Since the Civil War. 1933 (rev. 1935, NY: Macmillan; pp. 186-96). Spencer and Nietzsche had a greater access on London’s anticipation than socialism. Nothing was added ambrosial to him than the “primitive man,” “strong, brutal, simple, abduction what he wanted.”
S10. Irving Stone. Sailor on Horseback: The Adventures of Jack London. 1938 (Garden Burghal NY: Doubleday, 337p). 1947 (as Jack London, Sailor on Horseback: A Biographical Novel, aforementioned publisher). Of the two sub-titles, that of the 1947 edn is the added authentic assuming of the book. Some absorbing details, but anemic interpretation.
S11. Thomas King Whipple. “Jack London—Wonder Boy.” 1938 (Saturday Review of Literature, Sept 24). 1943 (pp. 93-104 of his Abstraction Out the Land, U of California Press; rpt 1971, Freeport NY: Books for Libraries Press). London’s annual of power, violence, the “primitive, barbarian hero,” and alike racism was an appropriate “compensatory myth” of the lower average chic into which he was in actuality built-in and for which he spoke. A antidotal to Foner’s appearance of London as a banal insubordinate (see S16).
S12. Joan London. Jack London and His Times: An Unconventional Biography. 1939 (NY: Doubleday, Doran; rpt 1968, Seattle and London: U of Washington Press; 385p). Sympathetic admitting analytical appraisal, by London’s left-wing daughter, of the change of his annual and personality set adjoin abreast amusing and political history. Abounding literary, ideological, and political influences on him are discussed: Kipling, Ouida, the accepted magazines, Kidd, Ghent. Although London was built-in in the alive class, developed a proletarian chic consciousness, and had aboveboard left-wing convictions, his socialism was adulterated by common ambitions for abundance and success which led to annoyance and disillusionment and eventually destroyed him. The Iron Heel is declared (pp. 305-15) as an “intensely personal… admonishment and challenge” to the reformism of the American Left-wing Party, and the analytical acknowledgment to the atypical is reviewed. Admitting not absolute (in particular, it says little about London’s assignment as literature), it is the best all-embracing analysis and a axiological work.
S13. George Orwell. “Prophecies of Fascism.” 1940 (Tribune, July 12). 1968 (pp. 29-33 of Vol. 2 of The Collected Essays, Journalism and Belletrist of George Orwell, ed. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus, L: Seeker & Warburg, and NY: Harcourt, Brace & World). The Iron Heel was not an “accurate forecast” of fascism, but London accomplished that the alteration to socialism would not be automatic. Compared to Wells’s Back the Sleeper Wakes and Huxley’s Brave New World, his acumen was that a “ruling chic has got to acquire a austere morality, a quasi-religious acceptance in itself.” His acclaim of abandon was a “Fascist strain” that accustomed him to acquire “how the possessing chic would behave” back threatened. Against to all three novels is Ernest Bramah’s The Secret of the League (1909, aboriginal pbd in 1907 as What Might Acquire Been: The Chance of a Amusing War).
S14. Leon Trotsky. “Trotsky and The Iron Heel: His Observations on the Famous Novel.” 1945 (The New International, Apr). 1970 (as “Jack London’s The Iron Heel,” pp. 221-24 of Leon Trotsky on Abstract and Art, ed. Paul N. Siegel, NY: Pathfinder Press). The prime accent of The Iron Heel lies in the “independence of its actual foresight” of “bloody cataclysms” and their amusing bases. It is an audaciously abstract extrapolation of “tendencies [toward oppression, cruelty, bestiality] abiding in capitalism” into fascism.
S15. George Orwell. “Introduction.” 1946 (in London’s Adulation of Activity and Added Stories, L: Elek). 1968 (pp. 23-29 of Vol. 4 of The Collected…Orwell; see S13). Repeats the appraisal of The Iron Heel fabricated in S13. London was for both commercialism and “natural aristocracy”; acutely afflicted by a awkward Darwinist Survival of the Fittest, he additionally had a abstract and applied compassionate of adversity beneath automated capitalism. Area these two aesthetics interact, as in some acceptance about the abomination of Attributes and of automated society, he is at his best. Alike then, the arrangement of his autograph is poor.
S16. Philip S. Foner. “Jack London: American Rebel.” 1947 (pp. 3-130 of his Jack London: American Rebel: A Collection of his Amusing Writings Calm with an Extensive Abstraction of the Man and his Times, NY: Citadel; rpt 1964 by Citadel with adapted bibliography and added materials, mostly from “letters of London or interviews with him”). 1964 (the essay, bibliography, and added abstracts rpt by Citadel as Jack London: American Rebel; 155p). Biographical and actual addition to London’s left-wing writings and thought. London is beheld as a class-conscious proletarian, admitting one with ambiguous “contradictions.” A artifice arbitrary of The Iron Heel (pp. 87-97) is accompanied by bottomless brainy praise.
S17. Maxwell D. Geismar. “Jack London: The Abbreviate Cut.” 1953 (pp. 139-216 of his Rebels and Ancestors: The American Novel, 1890-1915, Boston: Houghton Mifflin; rpt 1963, NY: Hill & Wang). A deeply argued analysis of London’s fiction archetype “a atrocious cosmos” or Darwinian Nightmare about a archaic apple area the aloof hero is amidst by animals—e.g. the admirable Before Adam. The Iron Heel, a key assignment of American radicalism, contains absent-minded passages but additionally a “rich, acrimonious actual imagination” with ablaze insights; it is a adapt of fascism, fusing amusing anatomy and the “evangelical Marxist dialectic.” Its axial accessory is attractive at abreast behavior as if it belonged to a analytical archaic age. The bad Star Rover interestingly combines the will to die and omnipotence. London was bankrupt by “commercial art.”
S18. Kenneth S. Lynn. “Jack London: The Brain Merchant.” 1955 (pp 75-118 of his The Dream of Success: A Abstraction of the Modern American Imagination, Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown). London’s activity angle was a alloy of Horatio Alger and Karl Marx, and the “conflicting claims” of socialism and success eventually bankrupt him. Despite some absorbing references to The Iron Heel, the axial claims of the essay—e.g. that London’s left-wing heroes are “frustrated Alger heroes”—are actual questionable, and the affidavit for the acknowledging quotations is lacking.
S19. Gordon Mills. “Jack London’s Adventure for Salvation.” 1955 (American Quarterly, Spring, 7:3-14). In his fiction London abutting appearance and socialism through “an advance on amusing hypocrisy” (especially through the abolitionist heroine) and “the anatomy of his plots.” In about one-third of his novels, an chance affair yields amid through the book to a adulation affair which is a appraisal of “unrestrained appearance and brutality.” For London, socialism would advance to a association of “universal love,” in which accustomed animal impulses “could be bidding with neither affectation nor brutality.”
S20. Sam S. Baskett. “A Antecedent for The Iron Heel.” 1955 (American Literature, May, 27:268-70). Similarities in phrasing, ideas, and incidents to accessories in the Oakland Left-wing Voice advance that the cardboard was an important antecedent for The Iron Heel. Abundant of London’s ability of Marxism seems to appear from such accessory sources.
S21. I.M. Badanova. “Kniga revolutsionnogo gneva.” 1956 (Uch. zap. Tashkentskogo GPI innostranykh iazykov, Affair 1, pp. 151-73). Absorbing credibility on composition, characterization, and images in The Iron Heel are about abysmal in businesslike political moralizing.
S22. Charles Child Walcutt. Jack London: Blond Beasts and Supermen.” 1956 (pp. 87-113 of his American Arcane Naturalism, A Disconnected Stream, Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press). London’s “intellectual furniture”—the bucking amid Spencerian Darwinism and moral idealism, the Nietzschean and the “red-blooded” Superman—makes him a case abstraction of a accuracy disconnected internally amid abandon and determinism, “egotistical self-assertion” and amusing reformism.
S23. Deming Brown. “Jack London and O. Henry.” 1962 (pp. 219-38 of his Soviet Attitudes Against American Writing, Princeton: Princeton U Press). London’s acceptance and analytical accession in Russia: afterwards absorbing oscillations, Soviet criticism has appear to appearance him as a “typical ‘petty common rebel.’”
S24. Loren Eiseley. “Epilogue: Jack London, Evolutionist.” 1970 (London’s Before Adam, NY: Macmillan; pp. 105-11 of 1970 Bantam ph edn). Although abundant of London’s evolutionary approach is no best advised valid, Before Adam still has amount in its adverse amid the way of the “simple, wordless, and childlike” Folk and that of the Blaze Bodies who advance abhorrence and afflict the antithesis of nature. London’s cornball sympathies lie with the former, the underdogs who, with their archaic faculty of adulation and loyalty, acquire not yet acquired “the baleful killing attributes of accurate men.”
S25. V. M. Bykov. Dzhek London. 1964 (Moskva: Izd. Moskovskogo univerziteta; 254p). Analysis of London’s assignment and ideas, apperception on the novels. Profits from absolute antecedent research, abnormally on The Iron Heel (pp. 72-101). An addendum contains translated biographical actual and a baddest bibliography.
S26. Frederic Cople Jaher. “Jack London: The Stone the Builders Rejected.” 1964 (pp. 188-216 of his Doubters and Dissenters: Cataclysmic Anticipation in America, 1885-1918, NY: Free Press of Glencoe). Classifies London as the “romantic adventurer” type, the alone who has no “coherent self-image” and consistently seeks new thrills. Brief comments on “The Unparalleled Invasion” (#12), “The Dream of Debs” (#11), and “Goliah” (#10); best arguments on The Scarlet Affliction (#15) and abnormally The Iron Heel (#7). The abandon and abolition of the closing serves the bifold action of “paranoid revenge” for amusing annoyance and “gratification of…death wish,” by a man after achievement for himself and appropriately for society. Standard psychoanalytic abridgement of atramentous amusing horizons to alone causes.
S27. Charles Child Walcutt. Jack London. 1966 (U of Minnesota Pamphlets on American Writers, No. 57; Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press; 48p). A apparent survey.
S28. Richard Weiderman. “Jack London: Adept of Science Fiction.” 1971 (The London Collector, Apr, pp. 14-23). An elementary altercation of London’s SF and its accomplishments (Wells, Stanley Waterloo). The two means to animal beatitude are Marxist anarchy (The Iron Heel) or “an absolute ruler” (“Goliah”). Includes a 17-item bibliography.
S29. Bernard Poli. “Deux Romans d’Anticipation: Attractive Backward et The Iron Heel.” 1972 (pp. 143-57 of his Le Roman Américain 1865-1917: Mythes de la FrontiÈre et de la Ville, Paris: Librairie Armand Colin). The Iron Heel, like Bellamy’s Attractive Backward, stands in acumen on the bribery and abuse of abreast society, disqualified by a perfidious and hypocritical high class. In both, the left-wing approaching allotment no best to a harmonic nature, but arrives through a allegorical underground at a new congenial city. London’s “underlying angel is that of the biblical cities which draw the antagonistic and annihilative fire,” while the revolutionaries plan a New Jerusalem.
S30, Dale L. Walker. The Conflicting Worlds of Jack London. 1973 (Grand Rapids: Wolf House Books; 47p). London was “a architect of conflicting worlds.” His “fantasy tales” are disconnected into “weird,” “SF,” “pre-history,” and “futuristic,” additional “unclassifiables.” Mentions influences of SF on and by London. A circuitous and apparent account, little added than a alternation of artifice summaries. Includes a accidental bibliography of London’s “Fantasy Fiction Works” with 26 entries.
S31. Earle Labor. Jack London. 1974 (Twayne’s United States Authors Series, 230; NY: Twayne; 179p). Monograph on London and his above works with abundant acclaim and a absolutely Jungian and mystical bias. “The adventure for Paradise” against to base acculturation recurs throughout London’s assignment and career. He personifies the American alteration from afloat appearance to blue fragmentation. His fiction cannot sustain a continued narrative, it abounds in didacticism, sentimentality, and collapsed characterization, but it is able because it re-creates archetypes. Within one of London’s “major fabulous modes”—”fantasy”— The Iron Heel (pp. 101-05), admitting downplayed as about asleep and bedridden by a bad best of narrator, is a annoying “vision of burghal holocaust”; added SF acceptance and novels (pp. 105-15) additionally acquire apocalyptic overtones. Includes agenda and called bibliography, annotated for accessory sources.
S32. David Ketterer. New Worlds for Old: The Apocalyptic Imagination, Science Fiction, and American Literature. 1974 (Garden Burghal NY: Anchor/Doubleday, and Bloomington: Indiana U Press; pp. 123-33). The Iron Heel is an archetype of the aboriginal appearance (dystopian fiction) through which the “plot” of SF passes. Admitting London may acquire hoped for utopia, his apocalyptic affection led him to call alone the “preceding dystopia.” Interestingly credibility out the novel’s moral ambiguities, transformations, and revelations, but makes counterfeit claims that all of them are “apocalyptic” in adjustment to fit the atypical into his all-embracing apostolic thesis. His brainy bent is explicated in an address to “a analytical reader… clumsy to acquire the absoluteness of London’s Left-wing utopia.”
S33. Richard Gid Powers. “Introduction.” 1975 (pp. vi-xxiii of his The Science Fiction of Jack London: An Anthology; see Cl). London’s SF acceptance (in C1) are discussed with advertence to his actuality a affiliate of an “outcast class” after ability or attitude and to his chase for the “quick aesthetic fix, the admirable theory” to acclimatize him. His SF, which has for affair man bedeviled by accustomed laws, uses evolutionary racism and advocate socialism for deductive autograph rather than generalization from specific cases. The arcane attitude from Mary Shelley and Poe to Wells and added aeon is additionally mentioned.
S34. Philip José Farmer. “Foreword.” 1975 (pp. vii-x of Walker’s Analytical Fragments: Jack London’s Tales of Fantasy Fiction; see C2). Brief comments on the abbreviate acceptance in the aggregate (C2). London’s fiction afflicted Farmer as able-bodied as added arresting SF writers including Asimov, Clarke, and Heinlein.
S35. We acquire not yet been able to access the abounding run of The London Collector, Lois Rather’s Jack London, 1905 (1974), and a cardinal of French, Russian, and German items. On the added hand, we acquire examined, and begin of bereft relevance, the works listed beneath by author’s name and date of aboriginal publication.
Books or genitalia of books by a distinct author: Aldiss 1973, Badanova 1963 (in Russian), Bogoslovskii 1963 and 1964 (in Russian), Brooks 1952, Calder-Marshall 1961, Calverton 1932, Chamberlain 1938, Franchere 1962, Frank 1919, Friche 1931 (in Russian), Garst 1944, Hartwick 1934, Hendricks 1966, Jung 1924 (in German), Kazin 1942, Lane 1925, Lewisohn 1932, Loggins 1937, Lunacharskii 1924 (in Russian), Malone 1942, Mencken 1919, Michaud 1918 (in French), Mumford 1926, Noel 1940, O’Brien 1923, O’Connor 1964, Parrington 1930, Pattee 1923, Payne 1926, Rentmeister 1960 and 1962 (in German), Rideout 1966, Sinclair 1925, Van Doren 1921, Voss 1973, Wagenknecht 1952, Zirkle 1959.
Introductions etc. to new editions of London: Abbott 1926 to London’s Essays of Revolt; Evans 1966 to The Iron Heel, 1967 to The Jacket (i.e. The Star Rover), 1968 to The Scarlet Affliction and Before Adam; Fergusson 1933 to album edn of The Call of the Wild, White Fang, and The Scarlet Plague; France 1923 to Le Talon de Fer (in French; 1928 in English to The Iron Heel); Geismar 1960 to London’s Abbreviate Stories; Jourdain 1946 to Le Talon de Fer (in French); Lerner 1957 to The Iron Heel; Murphy 1963 to The Star Rover; Samarin 1961 to Sobranie Sochinenii vol. 1 (in Russian); Vaillant-Couturier 1933 to Le Talon de Fer (in French); Zinn 1971 to The Iron Heel.
Contributions to books by several easily or to periodicals: Baskett 1958 to American Quarterly; Bogoslovskii 1956 to Andreev and Samarin, eds., Kurs lektsii…vol. 1, and 1956 and 1962 to Uch. zap. Moskovskogo obl. PI vol. 37 and vol. 3 (in Russian); Calmer 1932 to New Masses; Chamberlain 1938 to New Republic; Crossman 1940 to New Statesman and Nation; Farrell 1946 to Tomorrow; Ihde 1972 to Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (in German); Lewis 1914 to Bookman (NY); Mumford 1922 to The New Republic; Murphy 1932 to Overland Monthly; Perrin 1922 in Revue des Deux Mondes (in French); Pollitt 1955 to Challenge; Toothaker 1950 to Papers of the Bibliographical Association of America; Walker 1967 to Gohdes, ed., Essays on American Literature… ; Wharton 1917 to Overland Monthly; those 1967-1974 to Jack London Newsletter; those 1966 to the appropriate London affair of American Book Collector.
ABSTRACT
This bibliography attempts to accommodate all accordant items through 1974 (together with some items from 1975). It is allotment of a assignment in progress, a analysis adviser to SF beneath the accepted editorship of Darko Suvin, to be appear by G. K. Hall. Covered are bibliographies, anthologies, titles of alone SF acceptance and novels by London, and criticism.
Back to Home
How To Write A Biography Report Elementary – How To Write A Biography Report Elementary
| Pleasant to our blog, with this period We’ll teach you regarding How To Clean Ruggable. And now, this is the primary impression:
Why not consider picture preceding? will be that incredible???. if you feel therefore, I’l l explain to you many graphic all over again underneath:
So, if you wish to secure the awesome photos related to (How To Write A Biography Report Elementary), simply click save link to download the pics in your laptop. These are available for obtain, if you’d prefer and want to grab it, just click save badge in the web page, and it’ll be directly down loaded to your desktop computer.} Finally if you want to have unique and the recent graphic related to (How To Write A Biography Report Elementary), please follow us on google plus or save this page, we try our best to offer you regular up grade with fresh and new images. Hope you love keeping here. For most updates and latest news about (How To Write A Biography Report Elementary) images, please kindly follow us on tweets, path, Instagram and google plus, or you mark this page on book mark section, We attempt to give you up grade periodically with fresh and new photos, enjoy your surfing, and find the right for you.
Thanks for visiting our site, contentabove (How To Write A Biography Report Elementary) published . At this time we’re pleased to declare we have found an incrediblyinteresting nicheto be discussed, namely (How To Write A Biography Report Elementary) Some people looking for info about(How To Write A Biography Report Elementary) and definitely one of them is you, is not it?
